Hugh-Dancy.Net – Fansite for Hugh Dancy
A fansite for the talented Hugh Dancy

HughDancyNet

21 Actors Offer Their TV Characters One Piece Of Advice

BuzzFeed asked some of network television’s biggest stars to share words of wisdom with their characters as the new season approaches.
11. Hugh Dancy (Will Graham, Hannibal)

“Move to Florida, now. Get ahead of yourself. I think that Will has the capacity to be a really — not healthy, exactly — but a happy person. I always think of him as a funny character who is having an extremely unfunny period in his life. He’s a lover who is turning into a fighter, and neither is working very well for him.”

Source: BuzzFeed

June 30th, 2014
admin

Deadline Gallipoli – Teaser

The Official Facebook for Foxtel posted a teaser video for Hugh’s upcoming project Deadline Gallipoli, you can view the video below.

[KGVID width=”640″ height=”360″]http://hugh-dancy.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Foxtel.mp4[/KGVID]

June 30th, 2014
admin

Additional Hannibal Season Two Episode Stills

I have added additional stills from three episodes in season two to our photo archive. Thank you to farfarawaysite.com for the images.

June 27th, 2014
admin

‘Hannibal’: Bloody Well the Year’s Best Show

How great is NBC’s “Hannibal”? Here’s one way of measuring it. I’ve spent the three weeks since its second-season finale rereading the Thomas Harris books on which it’s based, including the ones I disliked the first time, just for the pleasure of sussing out how showrunner Bryan Fuller reworked and occasionally subverted them. (The way Fuller treats the grossly homophobic character of Margot Verger is a master class in how you can revere a source without being beholden to it.)

“Hannibal” shares its title with the third book in Harris’ series — which is also the last one I intend to reread; I love “Hannibal,” but I don’t “Hannibal Rising”-love “Hannibal” — but it’s set before the first. Should the show get so far, Fuller has said its fourth season will cover the events of 1981’s “Red Dragon,” which have already been filmed twice, by Michael Mann in 1986, as “Manhunter,” and in 2002 by, er, Brett Ratner. You could argue that after four novels and five movies, the world has had more than enough of Hannibal Lecter, who over the course of Harris’ novels has been transformed from an enigmatic presence to a lurid cartoon. The key to “Hannibal” is that it kind of agrees.

“Hannibal” isn’t shy about giving its Hannibal Lecter the spotlight, but it’s aware that focusing on aesthetically exacting serial killer is more than a little perverse. Rather than dress up that perversity in the sober garb of Serious Moral Inquiry, Fuller decks it out in an impeccably tailored plaid suit and gives it the run of the joint. If the movies are horror, Fuller’s show is Gothic psychodrama. (Fuller calls it “purple opera.) Harris’ novels paint the world as a rancid cesspool full of venal and conniving creatures, which in the later novels curdles into a kind of sophomoric nihilism. Fuller treats it as a what-if: What would a world populated by killers and would-be killers — a world where a man’s guts are ripped out to serve as the strings for a human cello; where a woman is cut into thing, perfectly even slices and laid out between glass vitrines like a museum exhibit — really look like?

As Matt Zoller Seitz says on his way to naming it the best TV drama of the year:

The subjective storytelling and flagrantly unreal atmosphere make what might otherwise be an unbearably gruesome spectacle not just tolerable but fascinating, at times weirdly stirring, in the way that a depressing opera or brutal fairy tale or Greek tragedy can be stirring. “Hannibal” showcases the most hideous violence ever seen on commercial TV — some of the murders and mutilations make the ghastliest stuff on “True Detective” and “The Following” seem mild — but because it’s all shot and directed with an aesthete’s love of color, texture, and light, it feels a touch abstract, at times defiantly figurative. The blood is photographed as if it were oil paint, the flesh like clay or wood (or latex, which much of it really is). The crime scenes are paintings, sculptures, and multimedia installations.

(Seitz also named the finale, which he describes without spoiling, the year’s best episode, and says he toyed with filling out his top five with four more “Hannibal”s.)

If you were to point out that aestheticizing this kind of vicious brutality is immoral, even grotesque, I’m not sure I could muster an easy answer, except to say that “Hannibal” rarely invites us to glory in its titular hero’s deeds or to share in his distaste for a disorderly world. The novel’s Hannibal kills the rude — a loudmouthed deer hunter or that famously invasive census-taker — and he kills to survive, but the show’s Hannibal, played with gelid panache by Mads Mikkelsen, kills for curiosity’s sake. He’s like “The Third Man’s” Harry Lime with a very sharp set of knives.

However you define the term, “Hannibal” is the most cinematic show on TV — it was mentioned several times in Criticwire’s survey on the best of the year so far — not only because of its precisely composed images but its use of sound (Brian Reitzell’s score sounds like dice rattling in an empty skull), and the way both evolve to tell a story rather than languishing in a static “look.”

With its gory violence and occasional highbrow dialogue, it’s hard to believe “Hannibal” airs on an American broadcast network. But really, it’s hard to believe it’s on TV at all. It’s a marvelous, malificent miracle. Fuller has said he has a seven-season plan for the show, and it would be a bloody crime if he wasn’t able to finish his design.
Source: IndieWire

June 20th, 2014
admin

Vulture TV Awards: The Year’s Best Drama Is Hannibal

We’ve reached the end of our week-long Vulture TV Awards, honoring the best things television served up in the past year. We’ve singled out Amy Schumer, Julianna Margulies, and others actors for their solid performances, given props to director Cary Fukunaga for a particularly wonderful scene from True Detective, and welcomed the likes of David Milch and Amy Sherman-Palladino as guest judges. And without further ado, Vulture TV critic Matt Zoller Seitz makes his pick for Best Drama.

The nominees are:

The Americans
The Good Wife
Hannibal
Mad Men
Orphan Black

And the winner is …
WINNER: Hannibal

(Spoilers follow for season two.)

It’s no longer surprising to come across a scripted drama that’s written, directed, shot, edited, and acted with great skill, but it is surprising to find one that takes the tonal and stylistic risks that Hannibal takes each week. Nothing on this Bryan Fuller drama is supposed to be taken at face value. Every frame unfolds in a dream space in which feelings and sensations are more important than facts. It’s an emotional procedural.

The subjective storytelling and flagrantly unreal atmosphere make what might otherwise be an unbearably gruesome spectacle not just tolerable but fascinating, at times weirdly stirring, in the way that a depressing opera or brutal fairy tale or Greek tragedy can be stirring. Hannibal showcases the most hideous violence ever seen on commercial TV — some of the murders and mutilations make the ghastliest stuff on True Detective and The Following seem mild — but because it’s all shot and directed with an aesthete’s love of color, texture, and light, it feels a touch abstract, at times defiantly figurative. The blood is photographed as if it were oil paint, the flesh like clay or wood (or latex, which much of it really is). The crime scenes are paintings, sculptures, and multimedia installations. The FBI investigators, led by Hugh Dancy’s Will Graham and Laurence Fishburne’s Jack Crawford, are art critics looking for influences, patterns, and evidence of a movement. The title character is a secret master and mentor, the private architect of an invisible school of mayhem. To paraphrase one of my favorite Roger Ebert quotes, this show is not just about what it’s about; it’s about how it’s about it.

Hannibal took risks right out of the gate, but in season two the storytelling grew wilder, verging on chaotic. The writers killed off major characters willy-nilly. The carnage approached American Horror Story levels. And yet there was a horrendously beautiful anti-logic to the tale’s construction, with key characters circling around each other, playing each other, and at times seeming to merge, via clever filmmaking, with each other (and with supporting characters). Two sex scenes between Hannibal, FBI psychologist Alana Bloom (Caroline Dhavernas), and Alana’s great secret love Will Graham were edited to make it seem as though the three were having a ménage a trois. Another sequence cut between Will’s conversations with Hannibal and Jack to make it seem as though they were, respectively, the devil and angel on his shoulder. This devil has tormented so many puny mortals, indulging his fantasy of acting with the sadistic indifference of an Old Testament god. The finale is a voluptuously drawn-out bloodbath whose intensity exceeds the most delirious violence in Brian De Palma and Mario Bava’s Grand Guignol thrillers. Hannibal’s house looks as though Jackson Pollock committed seppuku there. Bodies are cut, bruised, mutilated; there’s blood everywhere. All hope seems lost, Satan is victorious but on the run, the building and climax and resolution are all deliriously pulpy, verging on deeply silly, and yet the effect is intoxicating and moving, because the actors and filmmakers believe so completely in what they’re doing.
Source: Vulture.com

June 20th, 2014
admin

TVLine Interview

Eye on Emmy: Hannibal’s Hugh Dancy on Will and Lecter’s ‘True Love,’ the Possible Meaning of the Stag’s Death
Hugh Dancy has always been “an adventurous, not to say foolhardy, eater,” and his appetite has stayed strong and steady despite continued exposure to stunningly beautiful, undeniably horrifying cannibalistic dinner scenes on NBC’s Hannibal. “Nothing’s changed!” he says, with a hearty laugh.

The same cannot be said, however, for Dancy’s character — the addled FBI profiler Will Graham — over the course of Hannibal‘s critically lauded second season.

“The first half of the season, Will progressed to the point where he really embraced the part of him that was prepared to do something heinous,” Dancy says of his imprisoned character’s scheme to convince a prison orderly to murder the sociopathic Dr. Lecter. “That was a very good place to get to for me, because while I loved the awful rabbit hole that Will went down in the first season, it was hammering to him. He was terribly victimized. And finally, I got [to play] a bit of aggression and agency and manipulativeness — and that was actually really fun.”

TVLine caught up with Dancy to dish the challenge of acting while in a cage, the show’s homage to classic The Silence of the Lambs imagery and the implications of the season finale bloodbath.

Your character started Season 2 in a very static setting — either in a cage or in a cell. What was that like as an actor? Did you find it constricting? Or was it a fun challenge?
A bit of both. The character for the first time was armed with a full understanding of what had happened to him, so in a sense I was playing a slightly different guy [than in Season 1]. That was liberating. Obviously it’s not liberating to be in a 10×10 cell. I was excited about it to begin with, because it felt so in keeping with the classic Hannibal Lecter imagery, you know? And after about the third day I realized, “I’m really running out of things to do here.” [Laughs] But I think we did a very good job — because it’s not just me, it’s a lot about the different directors coming in — keeping it as fluid as possible and not letting it get repetitive. The beginning of the season, that was the major challenge.

The cage where people came to visit Will, in particular, looked so small. Did it ever make you feel claustrophobic?
No. They’re called “therapy cages,” and they’re real things. But in the middle of that great big hall, it was kind of nice at the beginning of the scene to realize that I had literally no decisions to make — at least in terms of blocking. But it was a very specific kind of acting. You have to just be very wary of not over-compensating — and at the same time finding something to do so you’re not just a static man in a box.

You mentioned the classic “Hannibal” imagery of the Baltimore State Hospital for the Criminally Insane. There was also the moment where Will goes to view Beverly Katz’s murder scene and he is donning the classic “Hannibal” mask and straitjacket, getting wheeled off the van. What was that experience like?
I’m pretty sure in The Silence Of the Lambs, the movie, that Hannibal is talking away from inside his mask. That was not really an option in my mask. I was completely immobile and mute. So really the only preparation was to work up a good glower. It’s such a strong image. It calls back to something that people are so familiar with. But also it represents the complete flip that’s occurring with Will.

You touched on it already, but we do see Will exploring his murderous impulses while he’s stuck in the psychiatric hospital with no guarantee that he’l ever get out. Do you think he attempted to have Dr. Lecter killed because it was his only way to stop him at that point? Or was there a part of him that tried it simply because it was exciting?
That’s a good question. It was a sense of having been pushed into a corner. Yes, there’s the somewhat convenient reality that there’s another serial killer working at the hospital. But the way Will goes about making that connection through Freddie Lounds and then talking the guy into doing it for him, [it was] very cold. He didn’t set out to do it for kicks, but to an extent, I think he’s enjoying this new version of himself — maybe unexpectedly so. And this is the way the show progresses for the second half of the season – that the most worrying thing for Will is how much he can enjoy that.

And of course, Will’s first act, pretty much, after being given his freedom back, is to return to therapy with Dr. Lecter! Will is the one person who knows what Hannibal really is — and what he’s capable of — and he is trying to get the snare around his neck. But Will also seems to be exploring stuff about himself at the same time. Those therapy scenes were just so layered and weird and creepy and remarkable all at once. What is it like when it’s just you and Mads Mikkelsen sitting across from one another doing those lengthy exchanges of dialogue?
It’s one of the great pleasures of the show. It’s so unlikely that you’d be able to witness — it multiple scenes in any given episode — two men sitting opposite each other talking in great, elliptical, poetic writing – and the fact that it’s Mads, obviously, makes it even better. I remember thinking first of all, “You can’t lie to Hannibal Lecter.” And secondly, there’s still too strong a connection between the characters for Will to go in with the sole aim of deceiving [Hannibal] and tripping him up. He has too many questions about himself that he still needs to answer relating to Hannibal. I guess it is multilayered and complicated and there’s a sense that when you’re two-thirds of the way through the season, you’ve really crawled deep into the thicket and you just have your fingers crossed. People are going to go wiggy. But Mads and Bryan [Fuller] and I had a fairly clear sense of this teetering tower that we were building. You pretty much described it. The idea is that the closer that Will gets to his one objective, which is, well it’s not clear what it is – apprehending Hannibal, killing him off or maybe running away with him — but the closer he gets to it, the murkier his designs become.

There’s a lot of dreamscape material in the show — the images of the “Willdigo,” to use just one example. Do you watch the episodes once they air to have a better understanding of the imagery? 
I will watch it. I mean, I’ve seen the first season. I’ve seen some of the second season – mainly because I’ve been to screenings of episodes. So I’ll watch it probably when we get back to do the third season… I’ll get around to it! [Laughs] But I’m very aware of the imagery — because 90 percent of it is written in the script. We know what we’re playing – which is pretty essential, because there is an odd interior logic to the development of those dream images as the season goes on. You wouldn’t want to feel like you’re just pulling an odd introspective face and they slap on a pair of antlers later.

[Laughs] Right.
I’m relatively obsessive about trying to make sure I’m making the right choice. So, I’m fortunate in that respect that Bryan is a very generous and collaborative writer and showrunner and — as best he can — is willing to share the upcoming storylines, etc., etc. And truthfully, I don’t think our show could work any other way, because it is so convoluted at times. It is so extravagantly heightened that you really need [every advantage] to chart your way through it.

Let’s talk about the second half of the season, the build-up to the finale. We had the Randall Tier “monster man,” the Margo and Mason Verger story arc — these bizarre, horrifying people who are all coming into Will’s sphere. We see that Will kills and possibly mutilates Randall, and he participates in watching Mason eat his own face. As you were exploring the character, did you think he was going down this road solely with the intent of capturing Hannibal? Or was there a part of him sort of dreaming of running away with Dr. Lecter, too?
I think absolutely both. Both can coexist — and part of the quality of Bryan’s writing is that he kept both those plates spinning right up until the bitter end. By the time we get to the penultimate episode and everything is falling into place, and we’re watching Mason eat his own face, we’re also gearing up for some kind of showdown. And there is no conceivable outcome that’s going to be uniquely satisfying for Will. He’s gone past the point that just apprehending Hannibal is going to draw a line under everything for him, because he’s opened up too big a can of worms in his own psyche. Equally, he’s never just going to pull out a gun and shoot Hannibal. They moved past that point. But the idea of running off over the horizon with Hannibal for some kind of glorious Mediterranean serial-killing retreat is also… clearly there’s more to Will than that as well. He’s created a situation for himself that can only be, at best, half fulfilling and obviously it turns out to be far worse than that.

Which brings us to the season-finale bloodbath, and that moment where Will approaches Hannibal. I found myself wanting to shout, “Why are you going up to Hannibal and getting that close to him? Don’t you know he’s going to gut you!” Yes, he’s in shock over seeing Abigail alive — and he’s maybe envisioning this whole alternate life with the teacup being rebuilt that Hannibal’s laid out. What did you think as you were reading that script?
The first season was more clearly laid out from the get-go, probably because there was more time to do that. Yeah, it was still bats–t crazy in its own way, but it was somewhat more traditional in the narrative. Nonetheless, in the first season, Bryan had described to me right from the beginning that, “Okay, at the end of this season you’re going to vomit up an ear. And you’re not going to know how it got there.” And that was very helpful for me actually, as an understanding of where I had to get to. In the second season, the equivalent was the idea of being gutted, being cut open by Hannibal. I talked about this with Mads and Bryan, and I saw it not just as, “Oh God, my guts are spilling out!” but almost as kind of consummation of their relationship – or whatever you want to call it… friendship, mutual obsession, whatever it is.

As I said, at that point, there’s no good outcome for Will and somewhere, even though he can’t know that Hannibal has a knife in his hand — in another part of his brain, he knows exactly what he’s turning into, and he wants it. He wants that ending and he wants to be cut open and he wants whatever he has internalized to be brought out. And actually Bryan did kind of make that literal by having, as I lie there on the floor bleeding out in that last image in the kitchen, you see that stag in the kitchen, bleeding out too. We’ll have to see where that lands us in terms of who Will is next season. But yeah, if you approach that scene on a literal basis, you’ve got to think, “Will, what the hell are you doing?” First of all I had a gun! But the intoxication of their friendship has overcome them both at that point.

Is the stag’s death supposed to represent the death of this scary side of Will’s nature that he’s been exploring? Does that part of him die when he gets stabbed? 
Let’s face it, I don’t think things are ever going to be easy for Will. You could look at it two ways: Yes, it could be that dark thing that he shared with Hannibal has been ripped out of him and he’s free of it. But it could also be that the stag represented the way that that darkness haunted him. And maybe it means going forward, he’ll be just as capable of dark acts, just without the guilt. I honestly don’t know. I do think it would be interesting to see a lighter Will and to learn a bit more about where he’s coming from. But I’m sure Bryan is cooking that all up as we speak.

So since we’re talking Hannibal and Will and their mutual obsession, Bryan Fuller had addressed with TVLine the somewhat sexual subtext between the characters this season, and he said, “The homoeroticism was absolutely intentional. If you could’ve heard me cackling in the editing room, you would take it with the naughty wink with which it was intended for a certain portion of the audience.” Were you aware of what was going on in his head beforehand — or did that subtext only come out once the episodes aired?
When he wrote them, I think it’s safe to say he didn’t write them with that in mind. It’s just that he ends up stuck in the editing room after everyone’s gone home, and that’s why he’s cackling. Look, I don’t believe, and I don’t think Bryan believes either, that these two guys are attracted to each other in that way. It’s a true love, but it just happens to not be a sexual one. That said, I also think that Bryan is a wicked, wicked man. [Laughs]

Source: TVLine.com

June 20th, 2014
admin

Deadline Gallipoli miniseries starts shooting in Adelaide

Sam Worthington’s Deadline Gallipoli miniseries begins shooting in Adelaide tomorrow with a stellar cast including UK actors Charles Dance — best known as Tywin Lannister in Game of Thrones — and Hugh Dancy, alongside Australian actors Ewen Leslie, Bryan Brown and Rachel Griffiths.

The four-hour TV miniseries co-produced by Worthington, tells the story of the Gallipoli campaign through the eyes of Australian war correspondents Charles Bean (Joel Jackson) and Keith Murdoch (Ewen Leslie), photographer Philip Schuler (Sam Worthington) and Britain’s Ellis Ashmead Bartlett (Hugh Dancy). Charles Dance arrives next week to play the British General Sir Ian Hamilton who heads the British command at Gallipoli. Worthington is not expected in Adelaide until the following week.

In rehearsal late last week Hugh Dancy, who is married to US actor Claire Danes, said he came into the role knowing relatively little about the Anzacs. In his coverage of the Gallipoli campaign, British journalist Bartlett wrote of the bravery of the Australian soldiers and is credited with starting the Anzac legend.

“I am interested because the focus of this in particular is the myth makers,” he said. “For better or for worse we mythologise things because they’re remarkable and they deserve to be remembered, and also because they’re such horrific events we can’t think of another way to respond to them.”

Dancy will be in South Australia until August but will fly home for a two-week break in July to see Danes, who is currently shooting a fourth season of the US terrorist thriller Homeland.

Winning the role of Charles Bean is a big break for NIDA graduate Joel Jackson, 22, a former musician from Western Australia who made a selfie screen test in remote Karratha using a camera on top of a crayfish crate after a day working in the mines.

Jackson has since read everything he can find about the Oxford-educated war historian C.E.W. Bean, including his diary, and has visited the Australian War Memorial in Canberra where Bean’s papers are held. He says the Anzac legend has helped Australians forge a sense of national identity by providing a common point of history and a story people can connect with.

“Anzac Day for me is the most special day of the year, always has been,” he says. “I grew up in Albany which is where they departed for Cairo and every year my grandfather would tell you the traditions of the Anzacs.”

Sydney-based actor Ewen Leslie has the job of playing Keith Murdoch, the war correspondent, publisher and father of Rupert Murdoch who smuggled out a letter critical of the British command. Leslie, a theatre actor and familiar face from TV shows like Love My Way and Redfern Now, said he had read what he could find about Sir Keith.

“I suppose you take as much stuff as you can and try to put together a picture of someone,” he said. “You bring parts of yourself to him and hopefully meet in the middle.”

Deadline Gallipoli, commissioned by Foxtel, is the third Gallipoli project to come to South Australia in less than a year following the ABC miniseries Anzac Girls and Russell Crowe’s blockbuster film The Water Diviner. The SA Government has invested $618,000 in Worthington’s project which will use the Adelaide Studios and locations including Maslins Beach which will double as Anzac Cove. It is expected to give a $6 million boost to the economy.

Other actors to join the nine-week shoot are Rachel Griffiths, who plays Sir Ian’s society wife, Bryan Brown as General William Bridges and two Australian actors based in LA, Anna Torv who stars in the US series Fringe, and Jessica De Gouw from the television series Dracula and Arrow. The director is Australian Michael Rymer who, with Dancy, has just finished shooting a season of the television series Hannibal in Canada. Source

Another article about the project

The sidebar has been updated to include the new project, we have also added the released images to our photo archive courtesy of both news sources.

June 14th, 2014
admin

Photo Session 118

I have added a photo session that Hugh did this year with photographer Merri Cyr to our photo archive.

June 14th, 2014
admin

StudioSystemNews – Interview

NBC’s psychological thriller Hannibal is based on the characters in Thomas Harris’ novel Red Dragon. Mads Mikkelsen stars as the eponymous forensic psychiatrist who’s also a cannibalistic serial killer. yet the lead role belongs to Hugh Dancy, who portrays FBI investigator Will Graham, whose own tortured psyche takes a toll during the investigation.

Dancy, 38, spoke to SSN about playing Graham, his memorable moments of the past season, and what happens when he brings his work home to wife andHomeland actress, Claire Danes.

SSN: Hannibal has been on for two seasons and Will has undergone a lot of changes. How have you seen him grow?
Dancy: 
In season one he had to face up to his own fear of insanity and what he might be capable of. His main change was realizing exactly who Hannibal was. In the second season he’s done a full turn and embraced that side of himself, which has taken him down a totally different path. I don’t think it’s over.

SSN: Where do you take him from here?
Dancy: 
There are so many possibilities as to who he could be. I don’t know where he’s going to go in season three. The ending of this past season was traumatic and horrifying, but in a strange way cleansing (laughs). Maybe I’m being optimistic, but I imagine in some ways Will might be more at peace.

SSN: How do you dive in to a character whose two sides can change from minute to minute?
Dancy: 
You try to get a richer understanding of his desires and what he’s born from. I’m assisted not just by (executive producer) Bryan Fuller’s writing, but by Thomas Harris, who wrote a whole novel describing the inside of my character’s head. I had a good diving board.

SSN: Do you think Will enjoys the darker facets of his personality, or is it tortuous for him?
Dancy: 
Both. It was much harder for him in the first season to acknowledge the part of him that was drawn to violence and darkness. What’s been worrying for him in the second season has been the degree to which he’s allowed himself to enjoy that.

SSN: Because there’s so much lying and bluffing between the characters, in portraying Will, do you play the lie or the truth?
Dancy: 
When it comes to Hannibal, I’m always playing the truth. It’s more interesting. It’s going to sustain the double bluff longer, both for Hannibal and the audience. It’s more insightful for the character and ultimately puts him at a much greater risk.

SSN: Is there anything in Will you remotely relate to?
Dancy: 
I would say almost none (laughs), but Will can be quite funny. He has a dry sense of humor that has very few opportunities to raise its head. So on the odd occasion that you see him bemusing himself, I feel some connection to him.

SSN: Do you find shooting scenes of blood and murder emotionally draining?
Dancy: 
Mostly not. It’s either very technical or a lot of fun. The show is so extreme and operatic that it’s far removed from something you would consider upsetting. For me the real horror comes from the psychological aspect, culminating in the final scene of the final episode, which I did find more upsetting.

SSN: That was a bloodbath! Jack gets impaled, Alana is hurled out the window, Abigail’s throat is slit and you get gutted. Why was it upsetting for you?
Dancy: 
Because it was a more believable, albeit extreme, form of violence, both physical and emotional. And probably because it was a culmination of six months’ hard work.

SSN: With so much source material, do you ever predict storylines?
Dancy: 
Everybody knows where we’re heading. We can’t get away from that famous image of Hannibal Lecter behind bars. That’s where he is in the literature and that’s where we’re going to end up. There’s no spoiler there.

SSN: Then how does the show make the ride unpredictable for viewers?
Dancy: 
Bryan has done a brilliant job remaining true to the spirit of the novels by dipping in and out of different parts, mixing it up. So even if you know the source material, you may not be able to tell what’s going to happen. The tone of the show is to get your pulse racing. If it didn’t, we would miss our mark.

SSN: How critical are you of your own performance?
Dancy: 
I don’t rush out to see myself. But on this show you often feel like you’ve got a lot of plates spinning—scripts can come in late, I’m charting my way through this complicated relationship with Mads; you feel like sometimes you’re just hoping for the best.

SSN: Do you watch the show to make sure it your performance came together like you hoped?
Dancy: 
At the end of the day you want to see the finished product to be sure that you landed the plane (laughs). But the fact that Mads and I are in it together is incredibly valuable because you’re making joint decisions. You’re not one guy out on his own playing the wrong note. We’re pretty much creating the tune together.

SSN: What was your most physically demanding day?
Dancy: 
Being painted black from my waist up, covered in goo, wrapped in a kind of embryonic sac, having antlers attached to my head, pushed inside a fake stag carcass, and having to burst myself out of it and scream at the top of my lungs. That was a weird day! (laughs) Not one I expect I’ll ever repeat.

SSN: Between playing Will, and your wife playing a bipolar CIA officer onHomeland, you must have some pretty interesting conversations about your characters.
Dancy: 
It’s valuable to compare notes. When you’re doing something extreme, especially in TV where you have to make big decisions quickly, you don’t get a chance to second guess yourself. You can come home at the end of the day thinking, ‘did I just do the most insane overacting in my life?’ It’s nice to be reassured.

SSN: How significant would an Emmy nomination be for this show?
Dancy: 
We’re a very particular, dark, complicated show with a very enthusiastic, but not necessarily vast audience, on a network. People don’t quite know what to make of that. I think [a nomination] would clear that up in a way. We’re certainly part of the conversation, but it would formalize it.

SSN: Do you find that the success of Hannibal has changed your career?
Dancy: 
During the first season, my son was born. I made the decision not to work between the first and second seasons to spend time with my family. So I don’t know that I’m yet qualified to answer that question. All I know is it can’t be a bad thing.

Source

June 10th, 2014
admin

Collider.com – Interview

The twistedly haunting, creepy and unexpected NBC series Hannibal is one of the best shows currently on television.  With shocking revelations, psychological cat-and-mouse games, and intricately detailed murders, it certainly stays with you, long after it airs.  And with everyone’s lives in peril by the end of the Season 2 finale, there’s no telling who will still be a part of the show, when it returns for a very differently structured Season 3.

After a recent screening of the finale, held for Emmy nomination consideration and proving that this show is so cinematically beautiful that it should always be watched on the big screen, Collider was invited to chat with actor Hugh Dancy, who plays Will Graham.  During the interview, he talked about how he learned about the events of the Season 2 finale, how he viewed the ultimate outcome for his character as the peak of the Hannibal/Will romance, why the whole last kitchen sequence was so challenging to shoot, and finding some way for Hannibal and Will to communicate in Hannibal Season 3, with Hannibal on the run.  Check out what he had to say after the jump, and be aware that there are spoilers.

 

Collider:  When did you learn about where things would end up in Season 2?

HUGH DANCY:  I think it fully came into shape for Bryan about half-way through the season.  He had so little time to prepare the full season that he pretty much approached the first seven episodes as a separate entity.  When we broke over the Christmas holiday, I spoke to Bryan and that was when he told me, “Look, I think we’re gonna have Hannibal cut you open.”  At that point, I wasn’t clear about the full extent of the carnage for the other characters, but I knew that he was going to cut me open, as he does in Red Dragon, the novel.  And I thought, “Okay, great.” 

At that point, I realized that the emotional arc of the show, for the second half, was geared towards that cutting.  It was not just a horrible, nasty, “Oh, no, my guts are falling out,” but it was a type of consummation that was like and embrace and a connection between the two of them.  So, that was what I clung onto.   It had to be horrific, also because it was the peak of their romance, in a way.  Bryan really laid it all out there.  I don’t know if part of him was thinking about coming back for a third season.  But to be fair, I’ve had that feeling all the way through, that he’s constantly just throwing it all out there.  The number of characters that either meet a very gruesome end, or at least get shot in the head in the second season, there’s never a sense that Bryan is trying to hold something back.  He’s very generous in his storytelling. 

 

Did you confirm with Bryan Fuller that Will Graham would survive Hannibal Lecter’s attack? 

DANCY:  No, I was confident that Will would survive.  Of all the characters that are bleeding out in that house, Will is the only one who we know from Thomas Harris’ novel that that actually happened to in the source material, and he comes back from it.  And I just know that the story between the two of them isn’t finished.  At the very least, there’s a third act there.  We know that Hannibal has to be behind bars, at some point, and we know that Will has to get him there.  It wouldn’t make sense, any other way.  So, I feel like I have a few more months in me.

 

With Hannibal Lecter on the run, at least for a little while, do you know if Season 3 will be about Will Graham tracking him down?

DANCY:  To be honest, I think that’s still up in the air.  I’ve had one or two really interesting conversations with Bryan about it.  It would be odd, at this point in the show, having built up the rich stew that we have, to suddenly no longer have Hannibal and Will together, at all.  I’m interested to see Hannibal gallivanting around the world, wherever he is, and I’m interested to see Will gallivanting around the world.  But, there’s gotta be some form of communication.  There’s the idea that Hannibal, in whatever terrible things he’s doing in his travels, is deliberately leaving a trail and even somehow communicating with Will, and maybe Will is responding.  Who knows?

 

Are you surprised at the reaction the Hannibal/Will relationship has gotten, and how it’s been romanticized by some of the fans?

DANCY:  No, because I think Bryan is fully engaged in romanticizing it.  I think it comes from #1, in that respect.  I don’t think that Bryan set out to write that.  I don’t think that he necessarily envisioned it.  Whether it came from his subconscious, or whether it’s there, sitting in the novels, or whether it’s something we created when we came together to make the first episode, but he ran with it, and we all ran with it.  It is now about these two men who are completely alone in a big, bleak world, and then see, coming across the horizon, the other person who reminds them of themselves, somehow.  That, to me, is endlessly fascinating. 

 

That’s why that moment where Hannibal is gutting Will while embracing him is so difficult to watch. 

DANCY:  Right.  And then, when Hannibal goes out onto his doorstep and is being washed away by the rain, it’s a beautiful moment.  It’s relief, but it’s also desperately lonely.  That’s what’s so great about Mads’ performance.  He has managed to create a version of Hannibal who can conceivably be distraught and vulnerable and can cry in a therapy session, and yet is an utter monster.

 

Because it was such a massive finale, were any of the sequences particularly challenging for you? 

DANCY:  That whole last sequence in the kitchen.  We shot a 20-hour day, or something like that.  We did two scenes before it, and then had to go into that.  It was midnight or one in the morning and we’d worked a full day, and then I had to get cut open and witness Abigail getting her throat cut, 27 times.  Surprisingly, because you’ve carried the story through, you almost forget the amount of emotion that’s being freighted along with you.  I remember watching what Mads was doing, and also becoming aware that it was going to be much harder for me.  We had to jump very high to make that scene work.  It was a great day at work, but I wouldn’t want to do it every week. 

 

Was there a moment, after you started the series, where you got over the nerves of taking on such an iconic story? 

DANCY:  To be honest, I didn’t feel that so much.  I guess I knew, in that respect, that the onus was going to be on the character of Hannibal.  It moves so fast, even when we’re getting ready for the first episode, let alone half-way through the season.  In getting ready for the first episode of the first season, you’re just trying to make decisions about the silly stuff, like which clothes you’re going to wear.  And then, you’re into the day-to-day and you’re trying to just make the most of the script you have, and any other considerations go out the window. 

When we had finished the first season and we had already gone so deep into what we were doing, it was too late.  It was either going to fly or it wasn’t.  But, I give Bryan credit for that.  He has to work in much more of a vacuum than we do, and he imposed his own imagination onto the source material without the anxiety of influence.  I just read his love of Thomas Harris in his writing.  He’s not trying to prove himself in an insecure way.  He’s just trying to take it to the next level.

 

Hannibal will return for Season 3 on NBC.


Source

June 10th, 2014
admin

Post Archive: